3 ms·
The US could close it's own border if it wanted to. The US designating them as terrorists would allow the US to go in and remove the threats just like any othe
by hunterb123 4y ago
The US could close it's own border if it wanted to.
The US designating them as terrorists would allow the US to go in and remove the threats just like any other cell.
Cooperation of the Mexican government is ideal and could be done through economic leverage like the last admin did with the USMCA to get the Stay in Mexico policy and Mexican troops on the border.
- 5ftfreak 4y agoThe US tries that all Latin America will respond. What a disgusting take you have made. Why are you in so much need of keeping the US as the imperalist machinery that is today? you neoconservative, bloodthirsty fucking loser.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- hunterb123 4y agoYou lashed out at me because you are ignorant of the issue, it's okay I forgive you. Please stick to the discussion next time though, instead of attacking the person, it shows weak emotional control, it's rude, and it's immature. Plus ya'know, it violates this site's guidelines.
- ASalazarMX 4y agoBesides closing the borders and economic sanctions (to your largest trade partner, mind you), you really don't want to go the armed way because terrorism. It's one thing to f-up small countries in the other side of the world, but doing that to a neighbor almost half your size, with a huge shared border, impossible to land lock, and with millions of sympathizers residing in your own territory... you don't want a giant Afghanistan/Cuba as your roommate.
- hunterb123 4y agoI'm not saying to lie about WMDs and invade a country on a false premise like Iraq, I'm saying to pick up specific people at a high level in the cartels. So if you're against the US picking these cartel members up the armed way, what method would be more effective or is the current status quo okay?