2 ms·

I think you missed the point of the article. In fact, the article specifically covers catching panics, so it doesn't bring down the entire application. As well

by 0x457 4y ago

I think you missed the point of the article. In fact, the article specifically covers catching panics, so it doesn't bring down the entire application. As well as covering when panic is okay. It doesn't say you should just unwrap everything and treat panic as error handling.

ArrayBoundCheck 4y ago
> the article specifically covers catching panics I see 3 mentions of catch, all in the same paragraph. It says you can catch it, offers no reasons why you want to then provides an example of output when you don't That doesn't sound like it "specifically covers catching panics"