2 ms·
> It's better to have a DB of the relative size of people's homes than not. Of course, but is it better to have a DB of the relative size of peoples’ homes—or
by mcphage 4y ago
> It's better to have a DB of the relative size of people's homes than not.
Of course, but is it better to have a DB of the relative size of peoples’ homes—or $1.7 billion?