3 ms·
I guess that having old artefacts is nice, but expecting 47GB of storage for free per repo seems ludicrous to me. Maybe it's a generational question, but I wou
by shakow 4y ago
I guess that having old artefacts is nice, but expecting 47GB of storage for free per repo seems ludicrous to me.
Maybe it's a generational question, but I would be pretty happy with 1-2GB (i.e. git history, and one artefact per platform).
- spyremeown 4y ago>but expecting 47GB of storage for free per repo seems ludicrous to me. I agree with this. This move makes perfect sense. I think GitLab does a lot already for the people that don't pay for the service.
- thayne 4y ago47GB would be less than 3 cents per month for object storage in backblaze b2. And most repos won't have anywhere near that much storage. It isn't zero, but afaik, GitLab's main competition doesn't have a similar limitation.