3 ms·

That's... an incredible footprint. Surely even if there was no size limit, deduplicating the build output would have made a lot of sense?

• TheRealPomax 4y ago
  Having said that: if you run a public open source project that has requirements beyond what a regular free user gets, then why not apply to the open source program[1] (which you almost certainly already qualify for) so you're not space constrained? Quoting the requirements: --- Who qualifies for the GitLab for Open Source Program? In order to be accepted into the GitLab for Open Source Program, applicants must: - Use OSI-approved licenses for their projects: Every project in the applying namespace must be published under an OSI-approved open source license. [2] - Not seek profit: An organization can accept donations to sustain its work, but it can’t seek to make a profit by selling services, by charging for enhancements or add-ons, or by other means. - Be publicly visible: Both the applicant's GitLab.com group or self-managed instance and source code must be publicly visible and publicly available. --- [1] https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/community-relations/opensource-program/#-gitlab-for-open-source-program https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/community-relati... [2] https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical