3 ms·
What I enjoy about HN is that for most part we ignore who is saying something and instead focus on the content. This is in contrast to a site like Twitter, wher
by nindalf 4y ago
What I enjoy about HN is that for most part we ignore who is saying something and instead focus on the content. This is in contrast to a site like Twitter, where the number of followers and blue checks make a massive difference to the number of people who will see your thoughts. This ends up creating a system that feels fairer. I don’t need to waste time cultivating an audience and farming clout, for instance. I can simply lurk and comment on the rare threads where I know what I’m talking about. I don’t care about my karma, and no one else cares about my karma either.
The exception to this is links to personal blogs, where links to domains of well known people immediately rise to the top. This is a simple question of time - it takes time to evaluate full articles and people are more likely to invest that time if the name seems familiar.
- ASalazarMX 4y agoThis is my take too. The asynchronous nature of HN takes some time to get used to, but it organically brings diversity to every discussion. I've seen insightful comments that make me want to follow a user, but in the end I'm glad I can't because it'd reduce diversity. Other social networks focus too much on following influencers, which naturally narrows your horizon to whatever the influencer thinks. People who follow influencers to criticize them are still narrowed to the direct opposite of what the influencer thinks. It's the monetization of bugs in our psyche.