4 ms·
You make some good points. Most I mention in this list [1] are communists, so anti-intellectualism looks historically a feature of the left. Indeed, if what I r
by nonrandomstring 4y ago
You make some good points. Most I mention in this list [1] are
communists, so anti-intellectualism looks historically a feature of
the left. Indeed, if what I remember of Messrs Snow and Orwell
applies, it's the (small C) conservative liberal who is the champion
of the literary intellectual. That's what the "Tories" once
represented.
So in a way that's what's weird about the present day "Tory"
party. They are nihilists. There's nothing there to even rally around
or against except a nebulous fear of change, because they are so
empty, so naked in their disgust for principles of any kind.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/context?id=32384301 https://news.ycombinator.com/context?id=32384301
- n4r9 4y agoIn that list 3 are explicitly communist, 3 are right-wing, and ISIS does not really fit into either category.
- rob_c 4y agoAgain straw man, another logical fallacy
- n4r9 4y agoPrevious poster made the following inference: A: Most people on this list of anti-intellectuals were communists. Therefore, B: anti-intellectualism is historically a feature of left-wing politics. By showing A to be false, the inference of B is undermined.
- rob_c 4y agoyes, of course, because you are completely correct about all things