That paper is in almosy 100% agreement wuth what I'm stating and the point that I'm making. The issue is about biogechemical cycling and limiting the view of wh

That paper is in almosy 100% agreement wuth what I'm stating and the point that I'm making. The issue is about biogechemical cycling and limiting the view of what a forest us to a set of trees, as opposed to a set of processes, is a blocking factor to most people's understanding of their potential for increase carbon storage. The broader issue I would also cute is that we have an extraordinary limited view of how these processes operate in most ecosystems because they are massively understudied.