>So are you on Elon Musk's side on this case, and what evidence points you on Musk's side? That would imply I want him to win, when in reality I just want twit

>So are you on Elon Musk's side on this case, and what evidence points you on Musk's side? That would imply I want him to win, when in reality I just want twitter to lose. I don't particularly care what happens to Musk, I just want him to deal maximum damage to twitter, at whatever cost to him it takes. >It's fine to have your own personal bias here. We all do. But at a minimum, discussing why we hold those views is beneficial for both of us. I did say why I hate twitter and want them to lose this case: they are a bunch dumb anti-free-speechers who coddle certain groups and ban others arbitarily, and on top of that their terrible poisonous platform is not conducive to intelligent speech. >why Twitters argument here is wrong and why you think they'd lose this court battle. I don't have a particulary strong expectation that they will lose, indeed if anything their legal position is stronger than Musk, as the experts are fond of saying. My hope is that they will underestimate Musk and do something dumb that will hurt their position and force a favorable concession that will hurt them more. Even if they win, that might anger or humiliate Musk so much that he destroys twitter out of anger, this is still fine by me.