4 ms·
It's there (table 5); it's just formatted differently. Presumably the original poster decided not to include it, as it added the footnote "Victims of other race
by hasty 4y ago
It's there (table 5); it's just formatted differently. Presumably the original poster decided not to include it, as it added the footnote "Victims of other races are not shown separately due to small numbers of sample cases", which doesn't fit his framing.
- throwaway220807 4y ago
- twic 4y agoWhat document are you talking about here? In the "full report" [1] table 5 is "Rate of victimization reported and not reported to police, by type of crime, 2019–2020", and has nothing about race. This document doesn't contain any equivalent of the cross-tabulations contained in the tweet, as far as i can tell. [1] https://bjs.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh236/files/media/document/cv20.pdf https://bjs.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh236/files/media/docu...
- hasty 4y agoThe report's been split into two docs. The referenced table is in the Supplemental Statistical Tables by the same authors: https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv20sst.pdf https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv20sst.pdf