4 ms·
Well, you have seq. The type of seq also doesn't guarantee this, but the implementation does
by nextaccountic 4y ago
Well, you have seq. The type of seq also doesn't guarantee this, but the implementation does
- foldr 4y agoI don’t think so? Seq is strict in its first argument, but that doesn’t provide a way of guaranteeing the order of side effects that I can see. Edit: You may be thinking of pseq, but I don't think that's in the Haskell 98 report.