3 ms·
This article is from 2012. The Dylos was one of the first relativelely affordable PM2.5 monitors. Now we have a much higher range of pretty accurate fine dust s
by ahaucnx 4y ago
This article is from 2012. The Dylos was one of the first relativelely affordable PM2.5 monitors. Now we have a much higher range of pretty accurate fine dust sensors using the laser scattering method.
We work a lot with the Plantower PMS5003 model (we use for our open-source DIY monitor kits) and its a very reliable module which is also used in the purple air and typically cost you around USD 15-20.
It is important to know that these sensors are factory calibrated for specific kinds of dust, for example the "arizona road dust" and thus if you measure different kinds of dust (like the wood dust in the article), the accuracy might be off.
Also the measurements are influenced by high humidty so it is important to use comprensation algorithms for this or preheat the air before measurements to reduce the humidity.
- walterbell 4y agoIs there a recommended sensor for particles in the range of 0.5 to 2.5 microns, like the Dylos DC1100 Pro?
- ahaucnx 4y agoSome low cost sensors are offering data channels down to 0.3 microns like the Sensirion SPS30 but in my opinion most of them are tuned towards delivering the highest accuray at around 2.5PM because many standards (e.g. WHO) are based on PM2.5.
- walterbell 4y agoIndeed, looks like most of the PM sensors are focused on PM2.5, a few detect PM1.0, and only the Dylos Pro attempts PM0.5-2.5, http://www.aqmd.gov/aq-spec/evaluations/summary-pm http://www.aqmd.gov/aq-spec/evaluations/summary-pm Workshops and garages are concerned with fine dust from cutting or milling metal and wood. 2020 paper reviewed 50 PM sensors and discussed calibration, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/23/6819/htm https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/23/6819/htm > We present an extensive review of the LCPMS currently available on the market, their electronic characteristics, and their applications in published literature and from specific tests. Most of the reviewed LCPMS can accurately monitor PM changes in the environment and exhibit good performances with accuracy that, in some conditions, can reach R2 values up to 0.99. However, such results strongly depend on whether the device is calibrated or not (using a reference method) in the operative environment; if not, R2 values lower than 0.5 are observed. 2021 Lawrence Berkeley paper, https://escholarship.org/content/qt2fm3s5zv/qt2fm3s5zv.pdf https://escholarship.org/content/qt2fm3s5zv/qt2fm3s5zv.pdf > End-users should be made aware that the PM data from the current low-cost sensors needs to be understood as an indication of a state change or a rough estimation rather than actual concentration in indoor environments.
- ghostpepper 4y agoAre these sensors factory calibrated? I’ve recently installed some 433 mhz accurite temperature/humidity sensors and connected them to Home Assistant. Part of why I went with consumer units as opposed to a DIY pcb was because I assumed that, while bare chips off Ali Express or DigiKey may be precise, I would have no way of knowing if they’re actually accurate.
- ahaucnx 4y agoAll modules we use in our DIY kits [1] are factory calibrated and we use the same sensor modules in our commercial sensor that went through the RESET Air certification. So these sensors are very good. We compare them side by side and see no differences in accuracy. Another important thing is the PCB and enclosure design to ensure accurate air flow to the sensors and also prevent internal heat influencing the temperature reading. In the DIY Pro kit we use a similar design like our commercial monitor but as a fully open sourced version. So it's very accurate. [1] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/kits/ https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/kits/
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- porknubbins 4y agoI’m confused about your comment in the third paragraph- I thought microns are microns. Could you explain how it needs to be calibrated for different types of dust?