3 ms·
This is entirely in line with the APL tradition. I suspect part of the motivation is that APL has a lot of binary operators, none of which have a conventional i
by mananaysiempre 4y ago
This is entirely in line with the APL tradition. I suspect part of the motivation is that APL has a lot of binary operators, none of which have a conventional infix form in traditional mathematics or anywhere else.
(Cf also the Smalltalk tradition, which associates all “binary messages” to the left, but that has the motivation of allowing user-defined names without fixity declarations.)