3 ms·

Elon Musk challenges Twitter CEO to a ‘public debate’ about bots

• scottydelta 4y ago
  It's nothing more than a stunt to further skew public opinion/rile people to support him backing out from the deal. This is unlikely to change the outcome when the case finally goes to court since he waived his rights to due diligence.
  • prirun 4y ago
    And what's completely stupid is, the public's opinion doesn't matter at all on this. Does he think the judge is going to take a public opinion poll to decide the case? Sheesh...
• zeristor 4y ago
  wouldn’t the court be the best place to resolve this? At the rate Musk is digging himself into a hole he could be a one man Boring Company.
• superchroma 4y ago
  This is just getting sad now.
• beardyw 4y ago
  For either party the lawyers should be horrified by this idea. Perhaps they have given up hope.
  • ss108 4y ago
    Twitter's lawyers (Wilson Sonsini IIRC) don't need to be. Quinn Emmanuel, on the other hand, might be.
• JoeAltmaier 4y ago
  Debate isn't the way to prove or disprove anything. That's what lawyers use to argue and convince. You want to know what's what, you have to study the thing itself, and gather evidence. Not listen to ego's shouting in the marketplace.