5 ms·
They did! MATE is fairly popular, but as to why it happens I think it's about people. There are only so many people willing (and able) to do the often difficul
by jrumbut 4y ago
They did! MATE is fairly popular, but as to why it happens I think it's about people.
There are only so many people willing (and able) to do the often difficult and unglamorous programming work that goes into maintaining something like Gnome.
If you're working on a major distro you have a certain level of trust in Gnome 3 because the same people delivered and supported Gnome 2. I'm sure when Gnome 3's direction became clear dozens or hundreds said "no way! I'm going to start my own fork which will never change!"
But how do you know which one to pick?
- eimrine 4y agoMate gives me a warm feeling of being at home where all is totally understandable and nothing has changed since 10+ years ago when Gnome 2 was a king.
- pantalaimon 4y agoThe sad part is that Gnome 2 had a whole ecosystem of third party software that integrated with it. Just a few of that got ported over to Mate (usually just s/GNOME/MATE/g) but it never gained the same traction.
- Wowfunhappy 4y agoWhy did it need to be ported at all? Shouldn't it "just work"?
- pantalaimon 4y agoMate had to change all “Gnome” strings to “Mate” so both could be packaged/installed in parallel and probably also for legal reasons. This means all DBus interfaces need to use the new name, a nautilus plugin must now call caja functions instead and so on.
- Wowfunhappy 4y ago...huh, well that's frustrating! Could this be solved with a basic compatibility layer?
- mycall 4y agoor decompile, touch strings, then recompile.