3 ms·

So curious to read these comments of yours. There is some truth in them, cloaked in all sorts of wild talk… “semidemonic parasites” !!! Is this serious? Anyway

So curious to read these comments of yours. There is some truth in them, cloaked in all sorts of wild talk… “semidemonic parasites” !!! Is this serious? Anyways, how desired is it really to weaponize the jealousy of the masses against those who have been given wealth? Any successful movement needs the buy in of some people in power. The strong rule the weak. And after all, slavery was and is a human institution; it is debt-servitude that maintains our social relationships. Don’t think it’s so simple as ousting the master.

6510 4y ago
> “semidemonic parasites” !!! Is this serious? Words are most useful imho if they mean something. I read "demonic" as "evil spirit" and "spirit" as "the prevailing or typical quality, mood, or attitude of a person, group, or period of time." Fascinating perspectives are to be had if you picture the demon as its own thing with people providing the vessel. It takes quite a bit of ritual [proverbial] chanting and dancing around the camp fire for a person to swap his natural spirit for the new one. the -ic in demon-ic only describes the thing as demon-like. Irish, greenish. I would argue they are actual demons. I see no value in using word to describe something that doesn't exist. > Anyways, how desired is it really to weaponize the jealousy of the masses against those who have been given wealth? Any successful movement needs the buy in of some people in power. The strong rule the weak. Yes, but no. lol The ones in power are not the strong ones. Increasingly less so! One has to desire ruling the weak and that requires it to present at least some challenge and/or requires at least some insecurity. A chess player doesn't desire to defeat someone who learned the game 20 min ago. Beating up a 6 year old is only interesting if you are 6 years old. > Don’t think it’s so simple as ousting the master. If the masses have no desire to be released. What is the point? When they do all it takes is to show them their actions have effect. (just a bit of light so they can see) Then one can return to the cabin in the woods. Entirely without leaving the shadows.

6510 4y ago

> “semidemonic parasites” !!! Is this serious? Words are most useful imho if they mean something. I read "demonic" as "evil spirit" and "spirit" as "the prevailing or typical quality, mood, or attitude of a person, group, or period of time." Fascinating perspectives are to be had if you picture the demon as its own thing with people providing the vessel. It takes quite a bit of ritual [proverbial] chanting and dancing around the camp fire for a person to swap his natural spirit for the new one. the -ic in demon-ic only describes the thing as demon-like. Irish, greenish. I would argue they are actual demons. I see no value in using word to describe something that doesn't exist. > Anyways, how desired is it really to weaponize the jealousy of the masses against those who have been given wealth? Any successful movement needs the buy in of some people in power. The strong rule the weak. Yes, but no. lol The ones in power are not the strong ones. Increasingly less so! One has to desire ruling the weak and that requires it to present at least some challenge and/or requires at least some insecurity. A chess player doesn't desire to defeat someone who learned the game 20 min ago. Beating up a 6 year old is only interesting if you are 6 years old. > Don’t think it’s so simple as ousting the master. If the masses have no desire to be released. What is the point? When they do all it takes is to show them their actions have effect. (just a bit of light so they can see) Then one can return to the cabin in the woods. Entirely without leaving the shadows.