Yet another "this won't get us to AGI" post that won't take a stand about how AGI should be defined. It also commits the other standard fallacies in these piec

Yet another "this won't get us to AGI" post that won't take a stand about how AGI should be defined. It also commits the other standard fallacies in these pieces: - endless argument by analogy that makes no falsifiable claims about the actual problem - comparing the training costs (energy and data) of an ML model to the operating costs of an individual human