This article is kinda a mixed bag of complaints that ranges from very reasonable and important to completely nonsense, which is to say it's very representative

This article is kinda a mixed bag of complaints that ranges from very reasonable and important to completely nonsense, which is to say it's very representative of discussions of the relative merits of operating systems For example, a lot of driver issues and architecture flaws (e.g. on wayland/X) it points out are really useful to consider for both maintainers of those subsystems and users of a desktop computer. But then you also get stuff where things are considered "impossible" for an average user because they involve... editing a text file? Using a shell at all? Not every difference in how you use something is a problem with it. I think having the exact same user interface for an entirely different operating system is a pretty insane expectation