3 ms·

I was not defending Musk, just trying to explain what he might be “thinking”. I see you’re point though. I guess he’d have to prove they used a formula that th

I was not defending Musk, just trying to explain what he might be “thinking”. I see you’re point though. I guess he’d have to prove they used a formula that they knew was wrong for it to be fraud?

blitzar 4y ago
> I guess he’d have to prove they used a formula that they knew was wrong for it to be fraud? They could know the formula was wrong - inherently every measurement is wrong to some extent which is why you see a +/- error, that is not fraud. For it to be fraud, they would need to measure it in the way they claim to, get a result they dont like, and report it as <5% anyway (with intent to defraud people). Which could happen in theory, but seems highly unlikely.