4 ms·
I agree but the main criticism I have of the article is that tornados don't challenge anyone's world view and that is often the problem that individuals face.
by xyzzy123 4y ago
I agree but the main criticism I have of the article is that tornados don't challenge anyone's world view and that is often the problem that individuals face.
An Amish person getting support via well worn community norms is one thing.
But so much of the change that people find hard is when they discover that their identity or community doesn't fit them quite right anymore.
How supportive are the Amish if you decide you want to live a different life?
Changing politics, gender, religion, social class (income shift), other identity values or moving a long way - these are often "out of context" problems for the community and friends you have.
The article's not "wrong" but life is nuanced. It's not easy to build new networks.
- kelseyfrog 4y ago> The article's not "wrong" but life is nuanced. It's not easy to build new networks. Couldn't agree more. Forming support networks is swimming upstream against our social currents. But, rising against default mode social relations is inherently liberatory at the same time. Or in words more friendly to the audience, working harder (powering through individually), doesn't always trump working smarter(building support networks).