3 ms·
>On FreeBSD you'll notice right away that you're dealing with a "complete operating system", a system that has been put together very well. Ugh, this argument
by gabereiser 4y ago
>On FreeBSD you'll notice right away that you're dealing with a "complete operating system", a system that has been put together very well.
Ugh, this argument is long in the tooth. It’s not a complete operating system. It never will be, and neither will GNU/Linux. To be “complete” you need to support all the hardware. You can’t.
Also, a base install of FreeBSD is missing the port tree sources… so complete…
- School-Cotton 4y ago> To be “complete” you need to support all the hardware. You can’t. You redefined a crucial word from the author’s thesis, in a way that’s obviously not remotely close to what was originally meant, and then concluded that the argument was “wrong”. Well, of course…