3 ms·
Alright, but I don't really care about any of that at all. Do you see any flaws in the actual math or logic of the paper?
by weberer 4y ago
Alright, but I don't really care about any of that at all. Do you see any flaws in the actual math or logic of the paper?
- quantum_mcts 4y agoHow about the first sentence in the body of the paper? > In nature, all motion can be described by the principle of least action: motion minimizes action. It is wrong. The actual principle is that the trajectories are stationary points of the action - not minima. (Edit: It is wrong even with the "locality" caveat that the author later adds.)