3 ms·

It's impressive that the search result has didactic steps towards a solution though....

• cm2187 4y ago
  Though my TI-89 pocket calculator could do that in the 90s
  • wussboy 4y ago
    But could it search for porn?
    • cm2187 4y ago
      I certainly tried
      • Rackedup 4y ago
        The boob function....
        • wussboy 4y ago
          I’m imagining “the boob function” just ignores any input and returns 80085?
    • Tao3300 4y ago
      Didn't need to. The arbitrary precision was already boner-inducing.
  • Tao3300 4y ago
    > my TI-89 pocket calculator could do that But that's not pocket size... what kind of pockets do you... > in the 90s Ohhhh, JNCOs!
• krallja 4y ago
  Not very impressive, as it doesn’t immediately (or ever) eliminate the term with a leading `0` factor.