3 ms·
That's hardly a counterargument. GP said you were high all the time, that's different from being addicted. There is some overlap, depending on the substance, bu
by carschno 4y ago
That's hardly a counterargument. GP said you were high all the time, that's different from being addicted. There is some overlap, depending on the substance, but also significant difference. Think of nicotine, caffeine (addictive, but no high) vs psilocybin (high but arguably not addictive).
- peteradio 4y agoMicrodosing isn't supposed to make you high. OP said they were taking /20 of a high dosing. So the assertion of "being high all the time" is sort of insulting.
- mtlmtlmtlmtl 4y agoI don't see how being high is an insult. OP didn't seem insulted to me.
- peteradio 4y agoI think incorrectly paraphrasing someone that misleads the conversation is insulting, perhaps that is a personal feeling of my own.
- mtlmtlmtlmtl 4y agoI could argue it's condescending to be insulted on the behalf of someone who's clearly not insulted, but how is this useful? We're all adults here, feelings are boring and irrational and they don't advance the discussion at all.
- valec 4y agoyou literally can't be high all the time on psychedelics (at least tryptamine-derived psychedelics) because of how quickly a complete tolerance to their effect forms at the 5ht2a receptors