Yes, this is obvious. I still can't see how the cheater with the 1000*1 votes has "achieved dominance"? > If each of these accounts votes fully for the candid

Yes, this is obvious. I still can't see how the cheater with the 1000*1 votes has "achieved dominance"? > If each of these accounts votes fully for the candidate Quadratic voting kind of discourages that: the marginal vote has more utility given to another candidate. Non-cheaters will tend to spread around their votes.