3 ms·
If it is not scientific, but social construct, it means it can be accepted or rejected. So should we as a society universally accept all social constructs? Or s
by slt2021 4y ago
If it is not scientific, but social construct, it means it can be accepted or rejected. So should we as a society universally accept all social constructs? Or should it be accepted on opt-in basis?
I can only recognize universal nature laws, because I cant fight physics, and recognize legal laws, because they are enforced.
But social constructs - it is not 100% clear to whom they are applicable and whether one can selectively reject certain social constructs.
If a woman can reject social construct that she must be housewife and take care of kids, then by the same logic anyone can selectively reject any trendy social constructs like having gender #69
- nindalf 4y agoYou talk a lot about Darwin's theory. You've strongly implied or outright said in many comments that gayness is a choice. Could you please go ahead and explain gay relationships in wild animals? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals). What's the matter, they're watching too much TV?
- Defletter 4y agoNothing in this messy, complicated life is 100% clear; everything has exceptions, outliers, and grey areas... including biological sex. If you want to spend your free speech and precious time on this Earth invalidating other people's gender, then that's your prerogative, but you shouldn't be surprised if they use their free speech against you in return. Them calling you a bigot (or whatever) is a direct retaliation to you saying something objectionable about them or who they are. If you think they shouldn't be so offended then you should ask why you're so offended at being called a bigot. It works both ways.