3 ms·
This is trivially correct if you assume: Perfect reproduction means error less than some threshold e. “True” means has enough sampling frequency and accuracy
by quickthrower2 4y ago
This is trivially correct if you assume:
Perfect reproduction means error less than some threshold e.
“True” means has enough sampling frequency and accuracy to ensure the error threshold is less than e.
- SideburnsOfDoom 4y agoThere's always a threshold though. Proof by contradiction: if there's no threshold, then sound fidelity can in theory be infinitely precise. But nature does not work that way - at Planck length distance breaks down, at the width of a carbon atom the resolution of a vinyl surface ends, etc.
- quickthrower2 4y agoAudiophiles talking about quantum fluctuations in their analog recordings :-)
- dr_kiszonka 4y agoI used to have this exact problem with my cables! For this reason, I've spent the last six months building quantum shielding for audio cables, with genre-specific time crystal coatings. It is now available in my Qtsy store, if anybody is interested!
- SideburnsOfDoom 4y agoI'm not an audiophile, actually. There's no point, IMHO the most limited component of the system (with the highest actual threshold) would be my ears, and I know why: lots of exposure to loud music of various kinds over several decades.