> The writer presents little numbers on prevalence. IMO, the writer doesn't present any argument at all. All she does is repeat that "clearly, fucking clearly

> The writer presents little numbers on prevalence. IMO, the writer doesn't present any argument at all. All she does is repeat that "clearly, fucking clearly medieval people bathed and were clean and into it" in a number of linguistic variations. The evidence presented consists of a list of rules from a public bath and some skincare tips from Hildegard von Bingen. How that implies "[M]edieval people bathed regularly. I am very serious. It is true." is beyond me. Unless it's a joke?