Maybe it's not discrimination on sex, although that's a tough sell despite the jury's ruling, but it sure seems like religious discrimination or something along

Maybe it's not discrimination on sex, although that's a tough sell despite the jury's ruling, but it sure seems like religious discrimination or something along those lines. Because at the core, he didn't want to fill the prescription because her medical needs somehow offended his personal religious beliefs. But I don't think it should have anything to do with opinion or discrimination. The fact that a pharmacist can legally, in some states, ignore a doctor's order for medicine for personal reasons is well beyond anything I would consider reasonable.