4 ms·

What number would you say is feasible, or are you fundamentally against a democratic republic system of government, and if so, why?

• stretchwithme 15y ago
  Those aren't the only choices. We have representative republic, not a democracy. I would prefer no coercion at all. Let people join a political entity if they wish and let them leave if they don't like how its going. And these political entities can cooperate amongst themselves. Or not. For example, the nations of Europe might choose to cooperate on border control. Some might share have a common currency. They don't have to be forced. The merits of an initiative are enough to entice them to participate. And if a particular thing fails, they should be able to walk away from it. Obviously, there's no guarantee government won't still screw up. But at least you're not trapped.
  • dkokelley 15y ago
    > I would prefer no coercion at all. Let people join a political entity if they wish and let them leave if they don't like how its going. I can already do that. > And these political entities can cooperate amongst themselves. Or not. They can already do that. I don't understand how the current system inherently prevents any of what you're suggesting. What you are describing is a problem with the people, not the system. What sort of system would account for problems with the people?