In theory, the challenge to a default judgement would be due process based. In practice, this particular case is practically a textbook example of when due proc

In theory, the challenge to a default judgement would be due process based. In practice, this particular case is practically a textbook example of when due process is appropriate, so I don't see how such a claim could possibly succeed. The point I was making by bringing up a due process claim was that there is no path for this case to become precedent regarding free speech.