> First off, his "fuck up" was leaking it That may have been a fuck up, in that he didn't intend to do so. But it was still information plaintiffs were entitle

> First off, his "fuck up" was leaking it That may have been a fuck up, in that he didn't intend to do so. But it was still information plaintiffs were entitled to. > second it's still protected under attorney client privilege if AJ didn't authorize it This is wrong. The vast majority of that information was discoverable and should have been discovered beforehand, but Jones withheld it. You can't refuse to "authorize" the release of discoverable information, which is probably why his lawyer didn't (initially) try to claim privilege.