> Does this set a precedent that anyone who spouts conspiracy theories about an event is targetable by those who suffered from that event? Interestingly, despi

> Does this set a precedent that anyone who spouts conspiracy theories about an event is targetable by those who suffered from that event? Interestingly, despite whether people believe free speech applies or not, the argument whether it could be considered free speech is actually irrelevant because Alex failed to test that defense by defaulting in the original trials by failing to turn over documents. As such, I can't imagine this would set a precedent. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/15/us/politics/alex-jones-sandy-hook.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/15/us/politics/alex-jones-sa...