> Who could possibly be on the side of the buyer? I don't know. It just strikes me as weird as forcing someone to buy something that they don't want to own or

> Who could possibly be on the side of the buyer? I don't know. It just strikes me as weird as forcing someone to buy something that they don't want to own or run. Especially after fighting it for months and even adopting a poison pill. Imagine if you agreed to buy a house for $1 million and the housing market crashes and the house is worth $500k. And now multiply those values by 50,000. Why wouldn't you try to get out of the deal?