4 ms·
There was the Clipper Chip [2] and the super-weak 40-bit 'export strength' cryptography [3] and the investigation of PGP author Phil Zimmerman for 'munitions ex
by michaelt 4y ago
There was the Clipper Chip [2] and the super-weak 40-bit 'export strength' cryptography [3] and the investigation of PGP author Phil Zimmerman for 'munitions export without a license' [4].
So there was a substantial effort to weaken cryptography, decades before 9/11.
On the dragnet surveillance front, there have long been rumours of things like ECHELON [1] being used for mass surveillance and industrial espionage. And the simple fact US spies were interested in weakening export SSL rather implied, to a lot of people, they had easy access to the ciphertext.
Of course, this was before so much stuff had moved online, so it was a different world.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_the_United_States#PC_era https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_th...
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy#Criminal_investigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy#Criminal_i...
- throwaway654329 4y ago> there was a substantial effort to weaken cryptography, decades before 9/11. Yes, agreed. Everyone should dig up their favorite programs and discuss them openly.