> I think on average this kind of "semantic search" works out for the better, for most people, most of the time. Let's say that maybe before this "magic" was i

> I think on average this kind of "semantic search" works out for the better, for most people, most of the time. Let's say that maybe before this "magic" was introduced, people needed to refine their search a few times but eventually got what they needed. But now, the majority gets a relevant result on the first time, but a few percent of searches don't go anywhere because you can't find a way to trick the AI and people eventually give up. You've improved your average metric, but arguably the search is worse since a few cases fail completely, when before they took just a bit more effort.