2 ms·
I'm pleased by making types with the same tag and fields compatible within a TU. That was a stupid thing to work around with offsetof. Unfortunate characterisa
by JonChesterfield 4y ago
I'm pleased by making types with the same tag and fields compatible within a TU. That was a stupid thing to work around with offsetof.
Unfortunate characterisation of constexpr in C++ over revisions as feature creep. It's more that any C++ should be executable at compile time with constexpr ultimately going the way of the register keyword, but selling people on things like compile file I/O is a long game.
Ultimately though it's hard to be too excited. I don't have a use case for C any more, beyond keeping some old code alive (with fstrict-aliasing et al and a sense that I really should port it to something else before I can no longer get any compiler to build a program out of it).