The small packet size is what is constraining BLE in the energy consumption comparison. It really wasn't meant for continuously streaming music. When advertis

The small packet size is what is constraining BLE in the energy consumption comparison. It really wasn't meant for continuously streaming music. When advertising every few seconds, like an Apple AirTag does, the energy usage averages about 5uA. That certainly beats the heck out of Bluetooth Classic. They just have different use cases. Eventually BLE will add a long packet size feature and win out. Between music and firmware uploading, there are lots of use cases nowadays. Nobody wants Bluetooth Classic, it's 20+ years old and uses a whole different stack.