3 ms·
This is exactly right from my experience in having worked on a few different BLE devices, one of which you've almost certainly used. If you use it like classic
by arcticbull 4y ago
This is exactly right from my experience in having worked on a few different BLE devices, one of which you've almost certainly used.
If you use it like classic bluetooth, you're going to have a bad time like classic bluetooth. Information in advertising packets (which can be as infrequent as a few seconds) is also used extensively in sensor applications which can last a few years on a coin cell battery.
- mafuyu 4y agoIf you live in the middle ground where you want to maintain connectivity, but sporadically send chunks of data on the order of a few to 100s of k, that's where it gets a bit tricky. BLE is still much better for power than classic in those scenarios, but the protocol isn't really intended for that type of bandwidth, and you might end up with a lot of custom stuff on top.