> The experiments showed that when using BR/EDR’s 2 Mb/s, the practical throughput were on average 0.786 Mb/s. [...] Meanwhile, when using BLE’s 1M PHY, the ave

> The experiments showed that when using BR/EDR’s 2 Mb/s, the practical throughput were on average 0.786 Mb/s. [...] Meanwhile, when using BLE’s 1M PHY, the average throughput were around 0.522 Mb/s and 0.938 Mb/s when using 2M PHY. The bit rate speed for the BR/EDR 1Mb/s mode were at an average of 0.104 Mb/s. Using these results, it shows that on average, the BR/EDR throughput speeds are faster than the BLE throughput speeds. I'm probably misunderstanding what the author intended here, but this just seems wrong. 0.104Mb/s (BR/EDR 1 Mb/s mode) is not faster than 0.522Mb/s (BLE 1M mode), nor is 0.786Mb/s (BR/EDR 2 Mb/s mode) faster than 0.938Mb/s (BLE 2M mode). I can't see how you would reach the conclusion that BR/EDR is faster "on average" than BLE with those results unless you're also factoring in BR/EDR's 3 Mb/s mode in some way, even though there is no BLE equivalent to compare it to.