3 ms·
I've always said computers have been so powerful for ages that it doesn't matter what the average home user buys anymore. I just upgraded from my trusty 2011-b
by suprjami 4y ago
I've always said computers have been so powerful for ages that it doesn't matter what the average home user buys anymore.
I just upgraded from my trusty 2011-built i5-2500K, not for any performance reason, but because the motherboard was getting flaky with random poweroff events and difficulty powering on again. My new i5-12400F doesn't really feel much faster. (I'd upgraded the old system along the way with better GPU and SSD)
- zokier 4y agoDesktops maybe. Vintage mobile CPUs often were quite anemic though.
- smlacy 4y agoIn totally the same boat! My daily driver home machine is an i5-760 (Released in 2010!) with a GTX 1060, and it works GREAT. I play lots of RTS-like games in 4K via Steam (Stellaris, Civ, Timberborn, Factorio, Valheim, etc) and there's absolutely no problem whatsoever. The "pcmasterrace" mentality that makes you think nothing works without the latest & greatest CPUs & Graphics is just blatantly false. I've always run Ubuntu on it as my daily driver, and I think that's part of my success. Windows machines of this age are seem to be more susceptible to long-term performance degradation. As a comparison, I routinely use it side-by-side with much more recent machines (Intel 10th gens) provided by my workplace, and all the machines feel nearly identical in speed and performance to my 12-year old beater. My only regret/hope is that my ancient motherboard doesn't seem to support more than 8G RAM, which is a bit annoying given how cheap memory is at this point.
- steeleduncan 4y ago> I've always run Ubuntu on it as my daily driver I think linux is an important part of using old machines. I use a 2014 11" Macbook Air, (not too old, but quite a weak processor for 2014), and macOS and Windows run like treacle. Stock Ubuntu with Gnome is snappy though, I don't even need one of the lightweight variants.