4 ms·
How is this similar/different than the Deezer one?
by nr2x 4y ago
How is this similar/different than the Deezer one?
- CharlesW 4y agoI'd also be interested in how it compares to iZotope RX's Music Rebalance (examples from earlier releases here: https://www.izotope.com/en/learn/stem-isolation-music-rebalance.html https://www.izotope.com/en/learn/stem-isolation-music-rebala...).
- avis 4y agoI'd be interested to know how it compares to iZotope as well as phonicmind.
- pcf 4y agoI just checked "Californication" (used for all their other examples here: https://soundcloud.com/honualx/sets/source-separation-in-the-waveform-domain https://soundcloud.com/honualx/sets/source-separation-in-the...) in RX9 Music Rebalance with the setting to "best", and I wasn't very impressed. Seems like this tool might be better than Izotope's.
- ksherlock 4y agoI just did a quick test of demucs vs spleeter:4stems. demucs is significantly slower but the output is better. in a semi blind comparison, I prefer demucs for all 4 tracks (drum, bass, vocals, and other). bass and other stand out the most so let me say a couple words about them. bass - the demucs bass has less bleed from other instruments and the volume is consistent throughout. with spleeter, the volume varies a lot and there are multiple sections of 1-2 bars where it just drops out completely. In Capo, the demucs spectrogram is nice and clear whereas spleeter tends to look like pencil smudges for the most part. other - with spleeter, whenever there are vocals, the other instruments turn to mush. demucs is much better. Oh, you can tell people are singing -- the instruments get muffled -- but you can still hear them.
- anigbrowl 4y agoIt's pretty decent. I threw a drum'n'bass track at it to see how it would cope with heavily produced material and the results were surprisingly good.