2 ms·
In some contexts it is a legal requirement to treat the date February 29th in a non-leap-year as March 1st. Not precisely related, just a go-to "they've though
by samatman 4y ago
In some contexts it is a legal requirement to treat the date February 29th in a non-leap-year as March 1st.
Not precisely related, just a go-to "they've thought of that" anecdote for when people are underestimating how thorough the law can be.
- NeoTar 4y agoOften people want to treat the law as if it were computer code, but fortunately sometimes it's more like the grade-school teacher making sure that the kids play nicely together.