4 ms·
>I'm sure that wasn't what they were looking for and their monthly bill is big ( perhaps too big ), but setting fire to the whole thing isn't the right move. I
by Accujack 4y ago
>I'm sure that wasn't what they were looking for and their monthly bill is big ( perhaps too big ), but setting fire to the whole thing isn't the right move.
It's owned by Microsoft, a for-profit company with a long history of hostility toward open source anything.
Literally setting fire to the building and servers IS the right move if it's what brings the most money in the door and keeps as little as possible from going out.
They don't and never will care about customer goodwill for something like their paid service, they'd stop offering it tomorrow if it made money for them.