3 ms·
It's a geometry problem. SFH takes up too much space. You're absolutely correct that there's heaps of wilderness in the USA, but the more SFH there is, the mor
by Tiktaalik 4y ago
It's a geometry problem. SFH takes up too much space.
You're absolutely correct that there's heaps of wilderness in the USA, but the more SFH there is, the more sprawl that is required, which means that that wilderness is further and further away.
I'd rather get to the wilderness faster and not have to drive through hours and hours of sprawling SFH suburbs.
- throwaway894345 4y agoGeometry has a solution! If you want to be closer to nature, move closer to nature. That seems a lot more reasonable than insisting that everyone around you uproot and reorganize. I'm strongly biased toward letting people live how they want so long as they aren't harming people (and I don't think "living between urbanites and nature" constitutes harm).
- Tiktaalik 4y ago> I'm strongly biased toward letting people live how they want Then people shouldn't be allowed to ban their neighbours from building whatever housing they want.