3 ms·
I think three.js is that. - All of the above except language - Library rather than engine I've had really good luck with it versus Babylon or Unity.
by EarthLaunch 4y ago
I think three.js is that.
- All of the above except language
- Library rather than engine
I've had really good luck with it versus Babylon or Unity.
- peoplefromibiza 4y ago> I think three.js is that. three.js doesn't produce native multi platform apps for desktop and mobile.
- EarthLaunch 4y agoThe mobile builds are its killer app, in my view as a gamedev. Unity has lost the plot in many ways. Desktop builds are important too, but there's competition there if you consider browser/electron as a desktop platform, plus Unreal. But Godot is the exclusive up-and-coming competition in mobile builds (that I am aware of; granted I am not a mobile dev).
- naet 4y agoThree.js is a 3d graphics library, not a game engine. You can use it to render your game but it doesn't bring the same things as Unity or Babylon. I have often worked directly with an html canvas and some javascript to make 2d web games. It works well for me and I enjoy it, but I wouldn't call it a "game engine" either.
- iFire 4y agoLet's be fair to three.js, the comparison would be to aframe. https://aframe.io/ https://aframe.io/ or similar projects. (Godot Engine Maintainer)
- EarthLaunch 4y agoThank you so much for your work on Godot. You are right, though I think all three can be compared, depending on the type of project. Unity is on the decline and I would be happy for Godot to become the future for those types of games.