3 ms·
That per day figure is misleading since it was a particularly good couple of days. But yeah he still made tons of money over the years at the families’ expense.
by dawnerd 4y ago
That per day figure is misleading since it was a particularly good couple of days. But yeah he still made tons of money over the years at the families’ expense.
- pibechorro 4y agoOver years? Nah. He covered it, fracked up, took it back and moved on. Its the trial tha keeps it in the spotlight.
- pwinnski 4y agoAs revealed in the trial(s), that's not true. He continuously promoted that false story for many years, even after he first started running into legal trouble as a result.
- frellus 4y agoCorrect, the Plaintiff's lawyer pointed to the $800k day and said, "on average you make this" and I firmly believe Jones was confused, and tried to correct it, but the goal of the lawyer was to inflate the income numbers to maximize damages. That being said, I don't understand how they couldn't have gotten all general accounting records as part of discovery, and if they didn't why they couldn't force a forensic audit by court order.