3 ms·
Yeah I do think that was seriously under calculated. It seems like reader comes up on nearly every article about google screwing up something like this. What
by nerdjon 4y ago
Yeah I do think that was seriously under calculated.
It seems like reader comes up on nearly every article about google screwing up something like this.
What I never understood though, why did they cancel it in the first place. I always figured that the crawler likely used RSS for discovery. I mean why wouldn't it? I constantly find that RSS has articles before I see them on the website.
So how much extra data were they really storing for supporting Reader? I mean they had to support the UI but it just seemed like an odd removal.
- acdha 4y agoI’ve heard it brought up by C-level executives considering GCP. The business models are different but the idea that things will be cancelled has been well linked to the brand. My understanding on Reader is that it was less the data than that it was older code and the internal dependencies were rotting.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]