3 ms·
I understand their intentions for doing this - i don't agree with them. My initial reaction was 'sleep mode' may be better and alert people to either log in and
by foxbee 4y ago
I understand their intentions for doing this - i don't agree with them. My initial reaction was 'sleep mode' may be better and alert people to either log in and "activate" their repo.
Once again, i don't agree with deleting dormant projects, I'm just curious what an alternative solution is?
- bmitc 4y agoIs saving static data really a huge cost sink for them? Seems kind of weird to have a business model of storing and handling highly dynamic data only to come down hard on the easiest use case of the product.
- fariszr 4y ago> My initial reaction was 'sleep mode' may be better and alert people to either log in and "activate" their repo. That's what they ended up deciding to do > We reached a decision to move unused repos to object storage. Once implemented, they will still be accessible but take a bit longer to access after a long period of inactivity.