Huh, interesting, I hadn't heard the term forward proxy used to refer to that before. I think that's kind of confusing to reuse forward proxy to mean something

Huh, interesting, I hadn't heard the term forward proxy used to refer to that before. I think that's kind of confusing to reuse forward proxy to mean something different. There's already a term for what the document is doing: MITM. I don't see why they need to additionally use the term forward proxy to describe it when forward proxy is also used to describe something else. Yeah, you're right about mitmproxy and Fiddler. They MITM the inner connection, while also acting as a proxy. The browser thinks it's simply proxying its connection to the destination through Fiddler, and doesn't realize that in addition to acting as a proxy, Fiddler is also acting as a MITM. So Fiddler is a proxy at the outer layer and a MITM of the inner layer. Interesting, Palo Alto networks has 3 features: 1. Forward proxy 2. Inbound inspection without PFS algorithms 3. Inbound inspection with PFS algorithms The way I would describe those is 1. Active MITM that generates new server HTTPS certs+keys from a trusted root 2. Passive MTIM that uses the genuine server HTTPS private key 3. Active MITM that uses the genuine server HTTPS private key All 3 of those cases are both a network MITM and a TLS MITM. As opposed to Fiddler which is a TLS MITM but not a network MITM (the browser intentionally sent traffic to Fiddler).